A Snapshot Of What To Expect
____________
(Old site, 2003-2006)
____________
In political U.S. terms, this blog is disgruntled Democrat turned Republican, slightly right of what is now deemed "center" -- but admits still to possessing moments of weakness for the rapidly vanishing Democratic party that helped win WWII and the Cold War. (Then again, finding oneself "right of center" is not difficult nowadays, given that according to what one sees of much U.S. political discourse, even a Castro -- and Hillary Clinton -- are apparently now rather rightist, and merely attending church weekly gets one labelled "Ker-ris-chan". Eeeeyou! Not one of those!)
In English terms, this blog loves this country, and it just wishes its politicians would somehow always remember that Britain is where our modern world truly began. Not Brussels. (Actually, to be more precise, just south of Brussels,
where Wellington had thumped a certain well-known continental who was also in favor of "European union".)
Email and Comments Policy
Expatyank@aol.com.
This writer sure as heck doesn't know everything -- unlike
the BBC's Jeremy Bowen, who obviously does -- so disagreement is expected. Well-expressed alternative views and interpretations are more than welcome, for that's how we all learn more in this life. Which means that vulgar and/or obscene comments will probably be deleted. So please phrase all abuse politely, and if in doubt refrain from any colorful metaphors and get thee to a thesaurus.
Some Things Never Really Totally Change
'I was asked the other day by a well dressed frenchman whether my province (for he took the United States to be a mere province) was not a great wine country and whether it was not in the neighborhood of
Turkey or
somewhere there about! Another time I was accosted by a French officer "vous etes Anglais monsieur" said he--"Pardonnez moi" replied I "Je suis des Etats Unis d'Amerique"--"Eh bien--
c'est la même chose"!'
Washington Irving, 1804.
Why this blog supports him?
Because the world's greatest power needs now, perhaps more than in decades, an experienced pair of hands at its helm,
and not a state senator of a scant 4 years ago, with a messiah complex.
Indeed, if this blog cannot support that former state senator, it is not necessarily over questions on the War on Terror or the economy. It is because, surprisingly given what we are told of the "post-racial" outlook he represents, publicly unaddressed remains this question:
"Guilty? or Innocent?" Theodore Roosevelt's Nine Reasons a Man Should Go To Church
1 In this actual world, a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoffed at or ignored their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade.
2 Church work and church attendance mean the cultivation of the habit of feeling responsibility for others.
3 There are enough holidays for most of us. Sundays differ from other holidays in the fact that there are fifty-two of them every year. Therefore, on Sundays go to church.
4 Yes, I know all the excuses. I know that one can worship the Creator in a grove of trees, or by a running brook, or in a man's own house as well as in church. But I also know, as a matter of cold fact, that the average man does not thus worship.
5 He may not hear a good sermon at church. He will hear a sermon by a good man who, whith his wife, is engaged all of the week in making hard lives a little easier.
6 He will listen to and take part in reading some beautiful passages from the Bible. And if he is not familiar with the Bible he has suffered a loss.
7 He will take part in the singing of some good hymns.
8 He will meet and nod or speak to good, quiet neighbors. He will come away feeling a little more charitable toward all the world, even toward those excessively foolish young men who regard churchgoing as a soft performance.
9 I advocate a man's joining in church work for the sake of showing his faith by his works.
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
May 14, 2008 at 7:01 am
James G.
It all comes back to the idea that if people think the government should be paying for something, they’re not going to stump for it themselves. And let’s face it, most Lit majors and those who like lit tend to come from the Nanny State side of the aisle.
I have a friend who was a hardcore freemarketeer until he discovered that his major in Literature was underappreciated in the greater economic scheme of things. He’s now a union organiser/agitator who specialises in organising illegals…Seriously. (Last time I saw him, he was over here teaching the TGWU how to do the same.)
It was like that study done in the states a couple of years ago on who gives what and how much. The guy who made the study set out to prove just the opposite of what he discovered, but it turns out that those who think the State has no business in anybody’s business (i.e. conservatives) gave disproportionately more to charity than those who favour State intervention. And it was by something like 35%, and was actually even greater for people at the bottom of the economic scale. (He compared across income brackets as well.)
That’s why most of the “charities” here in the UK are more than 50% funded by government grant…When the state takes all the money you would have given to charity, charities can no longer secure as much money for their survival. That’s why most charities here are more about lobbying the government for more funding and why they’re stated missions are to “raise awareness” rather than to actually do anything.