Reuters, reporting “the facts”:

Parliament on Monday will debate legislation allowing human-animal embryo research that scientists say could help treat conditions like Parkinson’s or multiple sclerosis but that opponents say is unethical…

Odd that Reuters chose not to phrase that instead more this way, but this blog will:

Parliament on Monday will debate legislation allowing human-animal embryo research that scientists admit could see the creation of human-animal hybrids and fetuses discarded in the millions but scientists argue the research is ethical…

Because that is similarly factual.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill of which that is a part, also includes:

…the removal of the requirement for doctors to consider “the need for a father” when offering fertility treatment…

True, mores have thankfully loosened and moved on: why should a child have an identified father? Even better, think of the “fun” it will be a few decades from now, when thousands of people have grown into adulthood, no one knows who their fathers were . . . and those “fatherless” adults are all milling around out there with many possibly being half-brothers and half-sisters. Gosh, just imagine the new avenues of research that will suddenly open up, and all the new funding that will be needed?