You are currently browsing the daily archive for March 18th, 2008.
Democratic U.S. presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton put the war in Iraq in the forefront of her campaign on Monday, attacking Democratic rival Barack Obama and Republican John McCain over an issue that has divided the country.
Actually, it might be called having a difference of opinion. In contrast, the Civil War “divided the country“. Currently, even as hot as tempers might flair on occasion, we haven’t gotten to a re-run of that just yet.
Clinton, a New York senator and former first lady, laid out her policy proposals to deal with the conflict, including ensuring that troops have sufficient rest time between deployments, pressing the United Nations to be more involved, and getting key allies to help stabilize the region.
“Bringing our troops home safely will take a president who is ready to be commander in chief on Day One,” she said in a speech.
“Withdrawal is not defeat. Defeat is keeping troops in Iraq for 100 years.”…
Good she’s cleared that up. Withdrawal meant Vietnam was not a defeat. But remaining here in Europe still, means World War Two was.
Time for still yet another (this time partly) BBC funded poll, as reported once again in inimitable BBC-fashion:
More than 50% of Iraqis think their lives are good, more than at any time in the last three years, a survey says…
But:
…BBC World Affairs editor John Simpson says the continuing divisions make it “pretty meaningless to talk about ‘Iraqi’ opinion.“…
Because:
…While 55% of all Iraqis believe that their lives are good, only 33% of Sunnis are happy with their lives, compared with 62% of Shias and 73% of Kurds…
So, apparently, for the often South African domiciled Mr Simpson, majority rule is a bad thing.
…Only 21% believe that the increase in US forces has made conditions for political dialogue in Iraq better, while 43% think the surge has made conditions worse.
Huh? So 79% believe “the surge” has NOT made “conditions for political dialogue” better? In turn, 57% also think “the surge” also “has made conditions” better? What the heck sorts of muddled questions were being asked of these poor interviewees?
And 38% want American forces to leave immediately, compared with 35% who want the troops to remain until security has been restored…
Or, put another way, 62% want coalition forces to remain at least for now, while 65% want . . . what exactly?
…Just under 50% of Iraqis now have confidence in the government, up from 39% in March 2007…
Meaning, that, even with all their troubles, a larger percentage of Iraqis manage to have confidence in their elected government than British do in theirs currently?



Recent Comments