You are currently browsing the daily archive for December 8th, 2007.

We landed back in Britain yesterday morning.  Arriving at Heathrow’s Terminal 4, we took the opportunity to use the IRIS booth instead of going to a passport officer.  I have to say that any friends at U.S. Immigration should take careful note: they ought to speak to their opposite numbers at the U.K. Home Office and see how the U.S. is falling behind technologically.  (Easy to pick on, when the Home Office does right it also ought to be commended.) 

IRIS is far superior to what U.S. citizens and “green card” residents have to endure to enter the U.S. The booth opens as you approach, you step in, and a plumy female recorded voice tells you “Look into the mirror“. You stare ahead, and your iris is within seconds checked against the registered database, in which your immigration details are stored.

I had so little trouble, and the exit doors opened so quickly, I didn’t realize I was finished; suddenly, I was out and standing behind passport control.  The British citizen wife, following immediately behind me, took a little longer because the recorded woman told her to “please step back” a bit, and she had to open her eyes a bit wider.  But within a few moments it easily worked for her, too.

Yesterday was the first time I have ever entered Britain without getting questioned about my status and having my passport stamped.  As a permanent resident and not a citizen, I understood the reason both had to be done.  However, even at a U.S. frontier, not just foreign passport holders but even U.S. citizens, have to have their passports stamped as “arrived”.

I have never understood that necessity regarding that treatment for the latter group.  After all, a U.S. citizen cannot be denied admission to the U.S. after the presentation of a valid passport.  So the need for such a “nod” of official approval has been a practice that has always, for myself, been grating and had something distasteful about it, given that every American under no prior legal restraint has as much right to leave and re-enter the U.S. unhindered by official “watchmen” as he would to travel between points within the U.S. 

Simply put, re-entering our U.S. is not supposed to “feel” in the slightest like returning to a former Soviet bloc state, where the state decreed that those returning from the “corrupting abroad” had to be noted as being “acceptable” for re-admittance. That’s not to say that “stamping” by the U.S. is meant to be oppressive in that Soviet sense, of course. Rather, it is likely just typical of an often petty over-officiousness and paperwork-obsessiveness that is characteristic of so much American governance, and which is never quite dealt with because, uh, well, “We’ve always done it like that”.

Over here, though, as IRIS demonstrates, a state can also carefully track those entering and exactly when . . . without piles of paper.  And immigration desks staffed by uniformed officers giving an often surly (and often intimidating) once-over and an official “smack” of re-admittance — as if those re-entering have just returned from “the outer rim” — are also unnecessary.

A Snapshot Of What To Expect

____________


(Old site, 2003-2006)

____________

In political U.S. terms, this blog is disgruntled Democrat turned Republican, slightly right of what is now deemed "center" -- but admits still to possessing moments of weakness for the rapidly vanishing Democratic party that helped win WWII and the Cold War. (Then again, finding oneself "right of center" is not difficult nowadays, given that according to what one sees of much U.S. political discourse, even a Castro -- and Hillary Clinton -- are apparently now rather rightist, and merely attending church weekly gets one labelled "Ker-ris-chan". Eeeeyou! Not one of those!)

In English terms, this blog loves this country, and it just wishes its politicians would somehow always remember that Britain is where our modern world truly began. Not Brussels. (Actually, to be more precise, just south of Brussels, where Wellington had thumped a certain well-known continental who was also in favor of "European union".)

Email and Comments Policy

Expatyank@aol.com.

This writer sure as heck doesn't know everything -- unlike the BBC's Jeremy Bowen, who obviously does -- so disagreement is expected. Well-expressed alternative views and interpretations are more than welcome, for that's how we all learn more in this life. Which means that vulgar and/or obscene comments will probably be deleted. So please phrase all abuse politely, and if in doubt refrain from any colorful metaphors and get thee to a thesaurus.

Some Things Never Really Totally Change

'I was asked the other day by a well dressed frenchman whether my province (for he took the United States to be a mere province) was not a great wine country and whether it was not in the neighborhood of Turkey or somewhere there about! Another time I was accosted by a French officer "vous etes Anglais monsieur" said he--"Pardonnez moi" replied I "Je suis des Etats Unis d'Amerique"--"Eh bien--c'est la même chose"!'

Washington Irving, 1804.

Why this blog supports him?

I like McCain Because the world's greatest power needs now, perhaps more than in decades, an experienced pair of hands at its helm, and not a state senator of a scant 4 years ago, with a messiah complex.

Theodore Roosevelt's Nine Reasons a Man Should Go To Church

1 In this actual world, a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoffed at or ignored their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade.

2 Church work and church attendance mean the cultivation of the habit of feeling responsibility for others.

3 There are enough holidays for most of us. Sundays differ from other holidays in the fact that there are fifty-two of them every year. Therefore, on Sundays go to church.

4 Yes, I know all the excuses. I know that one can worship the Creator in a grove of trees, or by a running brook, or in a man's own house as well as in church. But I also know, as a matter of cold fact, that the average man does not thus worship.

5 He may not hear a good sermon at church. He will hear a sermon by a good man who, whith his wife, is engaged all of the week in making hard lives a little easier.

6 He will listen to and take part in reading some beautiful passages from the Bible. And if he is not familiar with the Bible he has suffered a loss.

7 He will take part in the singing of some good hymns.

8 He will meet and nod or speak to good, quiet neighbors. He will come away feeling a little more charitable toward all the world, even toward those excessively foolish young men who regard churchgoing as a soft performance.

9 I advocate a man's joining in church work for the sake of showing his faith by his works.

Because They Don't Like Their Customers Having Opinions On Their Product...

Archives, 2006-present

 

December 2007
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Categories