You are currently browsing the daily archive for December 4th, 2007.

CBS News:

The television world is buzzing over a new reality show, “Who Wants to Marry a U.S. Citizen?”

It’s “The Dating Game” with a twist: A United States citizen interviews three legal immigrants and chooses one of them to date.

The contestants have visas or green cards, but not citizenship.

Adrian Martinez hatched the idea for the program, and shot a pilot. He says he’s speaking with at least one network about picking it up. His cousin, Angelo Gonzales, is host. Both of their families are from Mexico…

These gentlemen appear very close to the line here, but don’t seem to have crossed it – yet.  However, any contestant dippy enough (perhaps) to marry a foreigner as a result of choosing one on this purported “game show” might like to know a few things.

First, any marriage to a non-U.S. citizen must be a real marriage in order for U.S. residency (possibly leading to that person’s choosing later to apply for U.S. citizenship) to be granted legally.

Second — and this is VERY important given the above — there is a huge LEGAL difference between a “visa” and a “green card”.  A holder of the latter has no immediate “need” to marry a U.S. citizen; after five years’ U.S. residency, he is simply entitled to apply on his own.  Marriage to a U.S. citizen merely reduces the “waiting time” to apply for citizenship from five to three years.

However, a visa holder merely has the legal right to be present in the U.S. for a specified period of time. Essentially, that means this: any contestant who “falls in love” and marries a visa holder in order to facilitate that visa holder’s use of a “sham marriage” as the basis to support a “green card” application . . . is committing a serious crime.

…”First of all,” [Martinez] told Early Show co-anchor Hannah Storm Monday, “we’re not the U.S. government. We don’t hand out green cards. We’re not gonna marry anyone on the show. All we wanna do is play matchmaker between two different candidates who are specific demographics of the contestants. No one needs to worry about anything; we’re not gonna change immigration policy with a few contestants

That comment doesn’t quite make sense.  It has nothing to do with “immigration policy”.  Unless Mr Martinez doesn’t believe the U.S. should have one, of course.

If dating leads to nuptials, Martinez observed, the show foots the bill for the wedding and honeymoon because, “We figure it’s the least we can do if we can create a happy union between two people. But we’re having fun, playing the role of matchmaker.”

Gonzales reassured a dubious Storm viewers “absolutely” should believe contestants are looking for love, not citizenship, saying, “We’re just trying to set an arena for these people to just get to know each other. We’re not trying to get involved with the immigration process. We’re in the business of love, it’s that simple. We’re just trying to have fun.”…

Ms Storm’s dubiousness was readily understandable.  For while Mr Martinez may well profess to be interested in “fun” and “love, not citizenship“, any contestants had better understand a lot more is at stake outside possible “reality fame”.  Ultimately, it is they themselves who may have to face U.S. immigration officials; and if any marriage is a “sham”, it is a (let’s spell it out slowly, so it is clear) F-E-L-O-N-Y.

[Posted December 3, 9:31 PM NY time]

A Snapshot Of What To Expect

____________


(Old site, 2003-2006)

____________

In political U.S. terms, this blog is disgruntled Democrat turned Republican, slightly right of what is now deemed "center" -- but admits still to possessing moments of weakness for the rapidly vanishing Democratic party that helped win WWII and the Cold War. (Then again, finding oneself "right of center" is not difficult nowadays, given that according to what one sees of much U.S. political discourse, even a Castro -- and Hillary Clinton -- are apparently now rather rightist, and merely attending church weekly gets one labelled "Ker-ris-chan". Eeeeyou! Not one of those!)

In English terms, this blog loves this country, and it just wishes its politicians would somehow always remember that Britain is where our modern world truly began. Not Brussels. (Actually, to be more precise, just south of Brussels, where Wellington had thumped a certain well-known continental who was also in favor of "European union".)

Email and Comments Policy

Expatyank@aol.com.

This writer sure as heck doesn't know everything -- unlike the BBC's Jeremy Bowen, who obviously does -- so disagreement is expected. Well-expressed alternative views and interpretations are more than welcome, for that's how we all learn more in this life. Which means that vulgar and/or obscene comments will probably be deleted. So please phrase all abuse politely, and if in doubt refrain from any colorful metaphors and get thee to a thesaurus.

Some Things Never Really Totally Change

'I was asked the other day by a well dressed frenchman whether my province (for he took the United States to be a mere province) was not a great wine country and whether it was not in the neighborhood of Turkey or somewhere there about! Another time I was accosted by a French officer "vous etes Anglais monsieur" said he--"Pardonnez moi" replied I "Je suis des Etats Unis d'Amerique"--"Eh bien--c'est la même chose"!'

Washington Irving, 1804.

Why this blog supports him?

I like McCain Because the world's greatest power needs now, perhaps more than in decades, an experienced pair of hands at its helm, and not a state senator of a scant 4 years ago, with a messiah complex.

Indeed, if this blog cannot support that former state senator, it is not necessarily over questions on the War on Terror or the economy. It is because, surprisingly given what we are told of the "post-racial" outlook he represents, publicly unaddressed remains this question: "Guilty? or Innocent?"

Theodore Roosevelt's Nine Reasons a Man Should Go To Church

1 In this actual world, a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoffed at or ignored their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade.

2 Church work and church attendance mean the cultivation of the habit of feeling responsibility for others.

3 There are enough holidays for most of us. Sundays differ from other holidays in the fact that there are fifty-two of them every year. Therefore, on Sundays go to church.

4 Yes, I know all the excuses. I know that one can worship the Creator in a grove of trees, or by a running brook, or in a man's own house as well as in church. But I also know, as a matter of cold fact, that the average man does not thus worship.

5 He may not hear a good sermon at church. He will hear a sermon by a good man who, whith his wife, is engaged all of the week in making hard lives a little easier.

6 He will listen to and take part in reading some beautiful passages from the Bible. And if he is not familiar with the Bible he has suffered a loss.

7 He will take part in the singing of some good hymns.

8 He will meet and nod or speak to good, quiet neighbors. He will come away feeling a little more charitable toward all the world, even toward those excessively foolish young men who regard churchgoing as a soft performance.

9 I advocate a man's joining in church work for the sake of showing his faith by his works.

Because They Don't Like Their Customers Having Opinions On Their Product...

Archives, 2006-present

 

December 2007
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Categories