You are currently browsing the daily archive for July 22nd, 2007.

Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (1949):

Article 3

In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:

1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(b) Taking of hostages;

(c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment;

(d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

Reuters, July 22, 2007:

The Taliban kidnappers of 23 Korean hostages on Sunday extended the deadline for the South Korean government to agree to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan by 24 hours to 3:30 p.m. British time on Monday.

In Berlin, Chancellor Angela Merkel said Germany would not give in to the demands of the kidnappers — who also seized two German engineers and killed at least one of them – to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan…

…The 23 hostages belong to the “Saemmul Church” in Bundang, a city outside South Korea’s capital, Seoul. Most of them are in their 20s and 30s, and include nurses and English teachers

Sorry, did someone mention Guantanamo as somehow being a “violation” of the “laws of war”?  Well, as we know, not being a signatory to that Geneva Convention, the al Qaeda/ Taliban are naturally absolved from any international humanitarian responsibility whatsoever. For them, it is a conveniently rules-free world in which they may strike as a predator whenever it suits them and using whatever means they choose, no holds barred. 

Oh, and what are we, you ask?  The gazelles, of course.

_____________________________

As if to reinforce that point, from the Associated Press:

Police on Saturday arrested three Moroccans and accused them of running a “terror school” at a small mosque in central Italy, where they allegedly trained for combat, learned about bombs and stashed away chemicals.

Italian anti-terror police said they found barrels of chemicals and instructions on how to pilot a Boeing 747 in the Ponte Felcino mosque on the outskirts of Perugia. A fourth suspect was being sought…

Before one jumps to conclusions, think about it.  Clearly this is about terrorists and criminals, for chemical barrels and jumbo jet flying instructions are normally found at any place of worship.  Indeed, as we well-know, bomb-making lessons are already routine. 

. . . and you’ll never guess which country that is!

Given the subject, this is perfect for a Sunday. The BBC’s Matt Wells is hosting a World Service “documentary” on, of course, “religion” — BBC code for “Christianity” — in American politics. That seems like a huge subject; as we know, large parts of academic careers have been consumed by the study of that issue.

No matter. Mr Wells isn’t fearful of the challenge that awaits him in summarizing for a global audience in a “two-part” BBC report . . .

…In the US, where freedom to practise religion - or to have no religion at all - is enshrined in the constitution, the consequences of being an atheist are electorally dire for anybody seeking public office…

. . . just how most Americans are coercive, “In God We Trust”, “Under God” Pledge of Allegiance, Christian fundamentalist maniacs who demand presidents act like medieval crusaders . . . while the modern, enlightened atheist micro-minority are desperately trying to turn the focus away from “evolution” to real issues like “health care”.

Read the rest of this entry »

A Snapshot Of What To Expect

____________


(Old site, 2003-2006)

____________

In political U.S. terms, this blog is disgruntled Democrat turned Republican, slightly right of what is now deemed "center" -- but admits still to possessing moments of weakness for the rapidly vanishing Democratic party that helped win WWII and the Cold War. (Then again, finding oneself "right of center" is not difficult nowadays, given that according to what one sees of much U.S. political discourse, even a Castro -- and Hillary Clinton -- are apparently now rather rightist, and merely attending church weekly gets one labelled "Ker-ris-chan". Eeeeyou! Not one of those!)

In English terms, this blog loves this country, and it just wishes its politicians would somehow always remember that Britain is where our modern world truly began. Not Brussels. (Actually, to be more precise, just south of Brussels, where Wellington had thumped a certain well-known continental who was also in favor of "European union".)

Email and Comments Policy

Expatyank@aol.com.

This writer sure as heck doesn't know everything -- unlike the BBC's Jeremy Bowen, who obviously does -- so disagreement is expected. Well-expressed alternative views and interpretations are more than welcome, for that's how we all learn more in this life. Which means that vulgar and/or obscene comments will probably be deleted. So please phrase all abuse politely, and if in doubt refrain from any colorful metaphors and get thee to a thesaurus.

Some Things Never Really Totally Change

'I was asked the other day by a well dressed frenchman whether my province (for he took the United States to be a mere province) was not a great wine country and whether it was not in the neighborhood of Turkey or somewhere there about! Another time I was accosted by a French officer "vous etes Anglais monsieur" said he--"Pardonnez moi" replied I "Je suis des Etats Unis d'Amerique"--"Eh bien--c'est la même chose"!'

Washington Irving, 1804.

Why this blog supports him?

I like McCain Because the world's greatest power needs now, perhaps more than in decades, an experienced pair of hands at its helm, and not a state senator of a scant 4 years ago, with a messiah complex.

Theodore Roosevelt's Nine Reasons a Man Should Go To Church

1 In this actual world, a churchless community, a community where men have abandoned and scoffed at or ignored their religious needs, is a community on the rapid down grade.

2 Church work and church attendance mean the cultivation of the habit of feeling responsibility for others.

3 There are enough holidays for most of us. Sundays differ from other holidays in the fact that there are fifty-two of them every year. Therefore, on Sundays go to church.

4 Yes, I know all the excuses. I know that one can worship the Creator in a grove of trees, or by a running brook, or in a man's own house as well as in church. But I also know, as a matter of cold fact, that the average man does not thus worship.

5 He may not hear a good sermon at church. He will hear a sermon by a good man who, whith his wife, is engaged all of the week in making hard lives a little easier.

6 He will listen to and take part in reading some beautiful passages from the Bible. And if he is not familiar with the Bible he has suffered a loss.

7 He will take part in the singing of some good hymns.

8 He will meet and nod or speak to good, quiet neighbors. He will come away feeling a little more charitable toward all the world, even toward those excessively foolish young men who regard churchgoing as a soft performance.

9 I advocate a man's joining in church work for the sake of showing his faith by his works.

Because They Don't Like Their Customers Having Opinions On Their Product...

Archives, 2006-present

Categories