You are currently browsing the daily archive for December 5th, 2006.
Notice the headline and especially the very first paragraph. It’s interesting that the BBC chose to characterize Mr Gates’ view in that manner. For the substance of the exchange that provided that opening, as they themselves note down the page, was evidently this:
…Asked by the next chairman of the panel, Democratic Senator Carl Levin, if he believed the US was winning, Mr Gates replied: “No, Sir.”
He later said he believed the US was neither winning nor losing, “at this point”…
So it’s curious the BBC didn’t instead open with:
US Defence Secretary nominee Robert Gates has told a Senate committee that the US is neither winning or losing the war in Iraq…
One wonders why?
…“This serious incident is defined as controlled flight into terrain only marginally avoided.”…
Apparently, that’s the official wording for how, ummmm, they nearly managed to crash.
Once again we see the power of photojournalism on display. Gripping stuff, isn’t it?
The BBC’s Rory Maclean passingly mentions yesterday in a final paragraph:
…The Director of the Crown Prosecution Service, Ken MacDonald, said that although there had been an increase, the fears of a large rise in offences directed against Muslims in the wake of the bombings of the 7 July, had proved to be “unfounded”.
Hold on a moment, had we not also been told in huge banner headlines in August 2005 that in the wake of the (suicide) bombings of 7 July there had been a shocking increase of 600 percent (or in the BBC’s words, a “six-fold” increase) in hate crimes directed at Muslims? Yes, of course, that figure also conveniently took in only the AFTERMATH of the bombings, rather than having included the (one might think rather important) bombings themselves. But I suppose we shouldn’t go on about that either.
US plans permanent base on Moon
Oh sure, one imperialist occupation is apparently winding down. But now the U.S. is about to take on yet another? And this one will be permanent?






Recent Comments